The Cleveland Browns hold the No. 2 overall pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, and the biggest question facing the franchise is whether they can afford to pass on selecting a quarterback. With Deshaun Watson’s long-term health and performance in question, many analysts argue that the Browns must seriously consider drafting their next franchise signal-caller. However, others believe that using the pick on a non-QB, such as an elite defensive player or offensive lineman, could make more sense given the team’s current roster structure.
The Case for Drafting a Quarterback
The most obvious reason for the Browns to select a quarterback is Watson’s uncertainty. Since signing his massive $230 million fully guaranteed contract, Watson has struggled with injuries and inconsistent play. In 2023 and 2024, he missed significant time due to shoulder injuries, and even when healthy, he failed to perform at an elite level. The Browns, who are built to win now with a strong defense and solid skill-position players, can’t afford to be held back by subpar quarterback play.
Furthermore, the 2025 NFL Draft class features several high-end quarterback prospects. If USC’s Caleb Williams or North Carolina’s Drake Maye were still available at No. 2, it would be difficult to justify passing on a player with that kind of potential. Even if those two are gone, prospects like Shedeur Sanders (Colorado) or Quinn Ewers (Texas) could be viable options.
Drafting a quarterback would also provide financial flexibility. Watson’s massive contract limits the Browns’ ability to make key signings in free agency. A rookie quarterback on a cost-controlled contract would give Cleveland more cap space to improve other areas of the roster.
The Case Against Drafting a Quarterback
On the other hand, passing on a QB could be the smarter move if the Browns believe in Watson or if they think another player at No. 2 could make a bigger immediate impact. The team has a playoff-caliber defense led by Myles Garrett and a strong offensive core with Nick Chubb (assuming full recovery), Amari Cooper, and David Njoku. If the Browns are committed to Watson for at least another season, they might be better off drafting a top-tier left tackle like Joe Alt (Notre Dame) to protect him or selecting an elite pass rusher to pair with Garrett.
Additionally, if the Browns aren’t sold on any of the available quarterbacks, reaching for one at No. 2 could be a major mistake. There have been plenty of highly drafted quarterbacks who failed to live up to expectations, and using a premium pick on the wrong player could set the franchise back for years.
Another option is trading the pick to acquire additional draft capital. Teams desperate for a quarterback may be willing to overpay in a trade, allowing the Browns to move down while stockpiling future assets. This could be the best way to maximize value if Cleveland isn’t convinced a QB at No. 2 is the right choice.
Final Verdict: What Should the Browns Do?
The Browns are in a difficult position. If they truly believe Watson is still their franchise quarterback, drafting another QB could create unnecessary drama and waste a valuable pick. However, if they have doubts about Watson’s future—whether due to injury concerns or performance issues—it would be reckless to pass on an opportunity to secure their next quarterback, especially with a top-two pick.
Ultimately, the decision will depend on how the Browns’ front office evaluates both Watson and the quarterbacks in this draft class. If they see a can’t-miss prospect at No. 2, they should take him. If not, they should explore other ways to maximize the value of their pick, whether by selecting a non-QB or trading down.
The Browns have spent decades searching for stability at quarterback. Whether they continue to ride with Watson or draft his successor, they cannot afford to get this decision wrong.
